[1]AdamatzkyA, KomosinskiM, 2009. Artificial Life Models in Hardware. Springer, London, UK, p.35-64.

[2]AltendorferR, MooreN, KomsuogluH, et al., 2001. RHex: a biologically inspired hexapod runner. Autonomous Robots, 11(3):207-213.

[3]AndrewsJG, BuzziS, ChoiW, et al., 2014. What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6):1065-1082.

[4]ArientiA, CalistiM, Giorgio-SerchiF, et al., 2013. PoseiDRONE: design of a soft-bodied ROV with crawling, swimming and manipulation ability. MTS/IEEE OCEANS-San Diego, p.21-27.

[5]AyersJ, 2004. Underwater walking. Arthropod Structure & Development, 33(3):347-360.

[6]BarnesCR, BestMMR, JohnsonFR, et al., 2013. Challenges, benefits, and opportunities in installing and operating cabled ocean observatories: perspectives from NEPTUNE Canada. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(1):144-157.

[7]BoxerbaumAS, WerkP, QuinnR, et al., 2005. Design of an autonomous amphibious robot for surf zone operation: Part I mechanical design for multi-mode mobility. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, p.1459-1464.

[8]BreithauptR, DahnkeJ, Ghazi-ZahediK, et al., 2002. Robo-Salamander–an approach for the benefit of both robotics and biology. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, p.55-62.

[9]CalistiM, CorucciF, ArientiA, et al., 2015. Dynamics of underwater legged locomotion: modeling and experiments on an octopus-inspired robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 10(4):046012.

[10]CaoYJ, ShangJZ, LiangKS, et al., 2012. Review of soft-bodied robots. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 48(3):25-33 (in Chinese).

[11]ChenL, WangYC, LiB, 2002. Present state and future direction towards snake-robot research. Robot, 24(6):559-563 (in Chinese).

[12]ChenYH, LeS, TanQC, et al., 2017. A lobster-inspired robotic glove for hand rehabilitation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p.4782-4787.

[13]ChigisakiS, MoriM, YamadaH, et al., 2005. Design and control of amphibious snake-like robot ACM-R5. Nippon Kikai Gakkai Robotikusu, Mekatoronikusu Koenkai Koen Ronbunshu.

[14]CrespiA, BadertscherA, GuignardA, et al., 2005. AmphiBot I: an amphibious snake-like robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 50(4):163-175.

[15]CrespiA, KarakasiliotisK, GuignardA, et al., 2013. Salamandra Robotica II: an amphibious robot to study salamander-like swimming and walking gaits. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29(2):308-320.

[16]DerraikJGB, 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44(9):842-852.

[17]DeyBB, ManjannaS, DudekG, 2013. Ninja legs: amphibious one degree of freedom robotic legs. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]DiardJ, BessiereP, MazerE, 2004. A theoretical comparison of probabilistic and biomimetic models of mobile robot navigation. International Conference on Robotics & Automation, p.933-938.

[19]DudekG, GiguereP, PrahacsC, et al., 2007. AQUA: an amphibious autonomous robot. Computer, 40(1):46-53.

[20]DuellmanWE, TruebL, 1994. Biology of Amphibians, 2nd Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.

[21]DunnillMS, 1973. Animal tissue techniques. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 26(4):316.

[22]ZurichETH, 2010. Naro-Tartaruga. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland. http://www.naro.ethz.ch/p2/tartaruga.html

[23]FanJZ, ZhangW, KongPC, et al., 2017a. Design and dynamic model of a frog-inspired swimming robot powered by pneumatic muscles. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(5):1123-1132.

[24]FanJZ, ZhangW, YuanBW, et al., 2017b. Propulsive efficiency of frog swimming with different feet and swimming patterns. Biology Open, 6(4):503-510.

[25]FavaliP, PersonR, BarnesCR, et al., 2010. Seafloor observatory science. Proceedings of OceanObs‍‍’‍09: Sustained Ocean Observations and Information for Society, p.292-303.

[26]FESTO, 2006. Aqua_ray. FESTO Company.https://www.festo.com/PDF_Flip/corp/Festo_Aqua_ray/en/index.html

[27]FESTO, 2013. Bionic technology bearers for the water technology sector. FESTO Company.https://www.festo.com/PDF_Flip/corp/Festo_AquaJellies/en/files/assets/common/downloads/Festo_AquaJellies_en.pdf

[28]FloydS, SittiM, 2008. Design and development of the lifting and propulsion mechanism for a biologically inspired water runner robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(3):698-709.

[29]FranzMO, MallotHA, 2000. Biomimetic robot navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 30(1-2):133-153.

[30]FuL, WangBR, XuXH, 2005. Dynamic model and simulation of biped robot with heterogeneous legs. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 26(7):‍617-620 (in Chinese).

[31]FurnessRW, CamphuysenK, 1997. Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54(4):726-737.

[32]GermanA, JenkinM, 2009. Gait synthesis for legged underwater vehicles. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, p.189-194.

[33]GreinerH, ShectmanA, ChikyungW, et al., 1996. Autonomous legged underwater vehicles for near land warfare. Proceedings of the Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, p.41-48.

[34]GuoSX, MaoSL, ShiLW, et al., 2012. Development of an amphibious mother spherical robot used as the carrier for underwater microrobots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, p.758-762.

[35]GuoSX, HeYL, ShiLW, et al., 2018. Modeling and experimental evaluation of an improved amphibious robot with compact structure. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 51:37-52.

[36]GuoZY, LiT, WangML, 2018. A survey on amphibious robots. Proceedings of the 37th Chinese Control Conference, p.5299-5304.

[37]HajdukM, KoukolováL, 2015. Trends in industrial and service robot application. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 791:161-165.

[38]HanB, LuoX, WangXJ, et al., 2011. Mechanism design and gait experiment of an amphibian robotic turtle. Advanced Robotics, 25(16):2083-2097.

[39]HarkinsR, WardJ, VaidyanathanR, et al., 2005. Design of an autonomous amphibious robot for surf zone operations: Part II‍–‍hardware, control implementation and simulation. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, p.‍1465-1470.

[40]HeYL, ShiLW, GuoSX, et al., 2016. Preliminary mechanical analysis of an improved amphibious spherical father robot. Microsystem Technologies, 22(8):2051-2066.

[41]HeYL, ZhuLQ, SunGK, et al., 2019a. Underwater motion characteristics evaluation of multi amphibious spherical robots. Microsystem Technologies, 25(2):499-508.

[42]HeYL, ZhuLQ, SunGK, et al., 2019b. Visual positioning system for small-scaled spherical robot in underwater environment. Microsystem Technologies, 25(2):561-571.

[43]HeYL, ZhuLQ, SunGK, et al., 2019c. Cooperative localization and evaluation of small-scaled spherical underwater robots. Microsystem Technologies, 25(2):573-585.

[44]HiroseS, YamadaH, 2009. Snake-like robots [Tutorial]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 16(1):88-98.

[45]HiranoL, Martins-FilhoL, DuarteR, et al., 2009. Development of an amphibious robotic propulsor based on electroactive polymers. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, p.284-289.

[46]HopkinsJK, SpranklinBW, GuptaSK, 2009. A survey of snake-inspired robot designs. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 4(2):021001.

[47]IjspeertAJ, 2001. A connectionist central pattern generator for the aquatic and terrestrial gaits of a simulated salamander. Biological Cybernetics, 84(5):331-348.

[48]IjspeertAJ, 2008. Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: a review. Neural Networks, 21(4):642-653.

[49]IjspeertAJ, CabelguenJM, 2006. Gait transition from swimming to walking: investigation of salamander locomotion control using nonlinear oscillators. In: Adaptive Motion of Animals and Machines. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, p.177-188.

[50]IjspeertAJ, CrespiA, RyczkoD, et al., 2007. From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model. Science, 315(5817):1416-1420.

[51]IngerRF, 1964. Animal species and evolution by Ernst Mayr. Copeia, 1964(1):245-247.

[52]JiangCQ, LiYW, 2008. Multi-sensor information fusion and its application. Electro-Optic Technology Application, 22(9):6095-6098.

[53]JiangT, Munguia-LopezJG, Flores-TorresS, et al., 2019. Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: an emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Applied Physics Reviews, 6(1):011310.

[54]KarakasiliotisK, ThandiackalR, MeloK, et al., 2016. From cineradiography to biorobots: an approach for designing robots to emulate and study animal locomotion. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13(119):20151089.

[55]KatoN, 2011. Swimming and walking of an amphibious robot with fin actuators. Marine Technology Society Journal, 45(4):181-197.

[56]KaznovV, SeemanM, 2010. Outdoor navigation with a spherical amphibious robot. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.5113-5118.

[57]KimK, UraT, 2013. Terrain-adaptive optimal guidance for near-bottom survey by an autonomous underwater vehicle. Proceedings of the IEEE International Underwater Technology Symposium, p.1-8.

[58]KiontkeK, SudhausW, 2006. Ecology of Caenorhabditis Species. Wormbook.

[59]LachsWR, SutantoD, 1995. Application of battery energy storage in power systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics & Drive Systems, p.6.

[60]LaddTD, JelezkoF, LaflammeR, et al., 2010. Quantum computers. Nature, 464(7285):45-53.

[61]LaschiC, MazzolaiB, MattoliV, et al., 2009. Design and development of a soft actuator for a robot inspired by the octopus arm. In: Khatib O, Kumar V, Pappas GJ (Eds.), Experimental Robotics. The Eleventh International Symposium. Springer.

[62]LiMX, GuoSX, HirataH, et al., 2017. A roller-skating/walking mode-based amphibious robot. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 44:17-29.

[63]LiSC, XuLD, ZhaoSS, 2018. 5G internet of things: a survey. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 10:1-9.

[64]LiX, LiFQ, GuoYL, et al., 2020. The development trend and prospects of bionic sensors. Broad Review of Scientific Stories, (8):15-17.

[65]LiYS, YangMM, SunHX, et al., 2018. A novel amphibious spherical robot equipped with flywheel, pendulum, and propeller. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 89(3):485-501.

[66]LiangX, XuM, XuLC, et al., 2012. The AmphiHex: a novel amphibious robot with transformable leg-flipper composite propulsion mechanism. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems.

[67]LinZN, JiangT, KinsellaJM, et al., 2021. Assessing roughness of extrusion printed soft materials using a semi-quantitative method. Materials Letters, 303:130480.

[68]LinZN, JiangT, ShangJZ, 2022. The emerging technology of biohybrid micro-robots: a review. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 5:107-132.

[69]LiuCB, WangYJ, RenLQ, et al., 2019. A review of biological fluid power systems and their potential bionic applications. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 16(3):367-399.

[70]LundHH, 2004. Modern artificial intelligence for human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(11):1821-1838.

[71]MartínEM, 2010. Swarm Robotics, from Biology to Robotics. In-Teh, Vukovar, Croatia, p.47.

[72]MatsuoT, YokoyamaT, UenoD, et al., 2008. Biomimetic motion control system based on a CPG for an amphibious multi-link mobile robot. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 5(S1):91-97.

[73]MayrE, 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK, p.1-18.

[74]MirvakiliSM, HunterIW, 2018. Artificial muscles: mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Advanced Materials, 30(6):1704407.

[75]MuftiAA, HsiungB, 1989. Solid modeling in structural engineering. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 4(4):275-287.

[76]MurielDF, CowenEA, 2018. On the realization of a second buckling mode in a periodically-constrained heavy elastica. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 21:76-81.

[77]NguyenPL, LeeBR, AhnKK, 2016. Thrust and swimming speed analysis of fish robot with non-uniform flexible tail. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 13(1):73-83.

[78]OhashiT, YamadaH, HiroseS, 2010. Loop forming snake-like robot ACM-R7 and its serpenoid oval control. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.413-418.

[79]PanSW, ShiLW, GuoSX, 2015. A kinect-based real-time compressive tracking prototype system for amphibious spherical robots. Sensors, 15(4):8232-8252.

[80]ParkHS, SittiM, 2009. Compliant footpad design analysis for a bio-inspired quadruped amphibious robot. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.645-651.

[81]ParkSJ, GazzolaM, ParkKS, et al., 2016. Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science, 353(6295):158-162.

[82]PaschalT, BellMA, SperryJ, et al., 2019. Design, fabrication, and characterization of an untethered amphibious sea urchin-inspired robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(4):3348-3354.

[83]PaulsonLD, 2004. Biomimetic robots. Computer, 37(9):48-53.

[84](Pliant energy systems)PES, 2017. Robotics.https://www.pliantenergy.com/robotics

[85]PfeiferR, LungarellaM, IidaF, 2007. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science, 318(5853):1088-1093.

[86]PhibbsP, LentzS, 2007. Cabled ocean science observatories as test beds for underwater technology. OCEANS 2007-Europe, p.1-5.

[87]SandryhailaA, MouraJMF, 2014. Big data analysis with signal processing on graphs: representation and processing of massive data sets with irregular structure. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31(5):80-90.

[88]SaranliU, BuehlerM, KoditschekDE, 2001. RHex: a simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(7):616-631.

[89]SawanoS, IkedaJ, UtsumiN, et al., 1984. A sealing robot system with visual seam tracking. Robotica, 2(1):41-46.

[90]SfakiotakisM, KazakidiA, TsakirisDP, 2015. Octopus-inspired multi-arm robotic swimming. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 10(3):035005.

[91]ShihE, BahlP, SinclairMJ, 2002. Wake on wireless: an event driven energy saving strategy for battery operated devices. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, p.160-171.

[92]ShiLW, GuoSX, MaoSL, et al., 2013a. Development of an amphibious turtle-inspired spherical mother robot. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 10(4):446-455.

[93]ShiLW, GuoSX, MaoSL, et al., 2013b. Development of a lobster-inspired underwater microrobot. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(1):44.

[94]SpeersA, TopolA, ZacherJ, et al., 2011. Monitoring underwater sensors with an amphibious robot. Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, p.153-159.

[95]StefaniniC, OrofinoS, ManfrediL, et al., 2012. A novel autonomous, bioinspired swimming robot developed by neuroscientists and bioengineers. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 7(2):025001.

[96]SunSL, DengZL, 2004. Multi-sensor optimal information fusion Kalman filter. Automatica, 40(6):1017-1023.

[97]SunY, MaS, LuoX, 2011. Design of an eccentric paddle locomotion mechanism for amphibious robots. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, p.1098-1103.

[98]TakayamaT, HiroseS, 2002. Amphibious 3D active cord mechanism “HELIX” with helical swimming motion. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.775-780.

[99]ThomasAP, MilanoM, SellMGG, et al., 2005. Synthetic jet propulsion for small underwater vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p.181-187.

[100]TriantafyllouMS, TriantafyllouGS, 1995. An efficient swimming machine. Scientific American, 272(3):64-70.

[101]WangG, ChenX, JinLX, et al., 2017. Study of the free-swimming performance of a crab-like robot. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 38(7):‍1072-1078 (in Chinese).

[102]WangGB, ChenDS, ChenKW, et al., 2015. The current research status and development strategy on biomimetic robot. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 51(13):27-44 (in Chinese).

[103]WangHL, WangG, ChenX, et al., 2015. Dynamic modeling and motion control of a crablike robot in floating gait. Robot, 37(2):176-187 (in Chinese).

[104]WangW, YuJ, DingR, et al., 2009. Bio-inspired design and realization of a novel multimode amphibious robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, p.140-145.

[105]WegstUGK, BaiH, SaizE, et al., 2015. Bioinspired structural materials. Nature Materials, 14(1):23-36.

[106]WuGH, LuZY, LuoZR, et al., 2019. Experimental analysis of a novel adaptively counter-rotating wave energy converter for powering drifters. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(6):171.

[107]WuZY, QiJ, ZhangS, 2014. Amphibious robots: a review. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 494-495:1036-1041.

[108]Alvarado PVy, ChinS, LarsonW, et al., 2010. A soft body under-actuated approach to multi degree of freedom biomimetic robots: a stingray example. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, p.473-478.

[109]YangQH, YuJZ, TanM, et al., 2007. Amphibious biomimetic robots: a review. Robot, 29(6):601-608 (in Chinese).

[110]YangXB, WangTM, LiangJH, et al., 2015. Survey on the novel hybrid aquatic–aerial amphibious aircraft: aquatic unmanned aerial vehicle (AquaUAV). Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 74:131-151.

[111]YangXR, LuoGE, GuoY, et al., 2001. Multisensor poly information fusion technology and its application. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sensor Technology, p.449-454.

[112]YimM, ShirmohammadiB, BenelliD, 2007. Amphibious modular robotic astrobiology. Defense and Security Symposium, p.65611S.

[113]YooSY, ShimH, JunBH, et al., 2012. Design of walking and swimming algorithms for a multi-legged underwater robot Crabster CR200. Proceedings of the Oceans Conference, p.‍74-87.

[114]YuJZ, DingR, YangQH, et al., 2012. On a bio-inspired amphibious robot capable of multimodal motion. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 17(5):847-856.

[115]ZhaFS, BingZS, WangJ, et al., 2015. Developing of a wheel-paddle integrated propeller for amphibious robot based on moving webbed paddle wheels. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 701-702:689-696.

[116]ZhangDB, TanHL, PanXF, 2003. The realization of distributed control in snake robot. Proceedings of the 15th National Conference of Computer Science and Technology in China, p.509-512 (in Chinese).

[117]ZhangSW, LiangX, XuLC, et al., 2013. Initial development of a novel amphibious robot with transformable fin-leg composite propulsion mechanisms. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 10(4):434-445.

[118]ZhangSW, ZhouYC, XuM, et al., 2016. AmphiHex-I: locomotory performance in amphibious environments with specially designed transformable flipper legs. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 21(3):1720-1731.

[119]ZhengJ, 2012. Design and Motion Analysis of Bionic Robot Crocodile Crawling Mechanism. MS Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China(in Chinese).

[120]ZhongB, ZhouYC, LiXX, et al., 2016. Locomotion performance of the amphibious robot on various terrains and underwater with flexible flipper legs. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 13(4):525-536.